Original title: Lighting-fast mouse control with the keyboard
Article
The discussion around lighting-fast keyboard mouse control frames it as a practical mouseless workflow for people who want fewer hand movements, faster click targeting, or a fallback when a mouse is unavailable. Commenters compare legacy ideas like the Amiga approach with modern tools, linking to Keynav, Wayland ports, and other projects built to move and click through coordinates or keystroke mode. The thread links the idea to broader productivity and accessibility themes, with some users emphasizing one-handed control and others warning that better interface design should support non-pointing-device interaction by default. Several responses highlight alternatives such as Homerow, Vimium, and shell/browser navigation with keyboard shortcuts, suggesting full-desktop tools can reduce mouse dependence in non-graphical tasks. A major line of critique targets closed-source solutions and trust concerns, while others advocate open-source options and note mixed reliability across Linux Wayland/Xorg/macOS. Contributors also mention practical limitations, including where pointer replacement helps little in drawing-heavy contexts. Overall, the thread treats keyboard pointer control as a useful but partial approach with real ecosystem and compatibility constraints.
Participants reported both nostalgia and practicality, referencing Amiga-style key-driven navigation, ReqTools, and MCP as early examples that were limited but functional. Several comments argue faster keyboard navigation is already possible through tools like Homerow, Vimium, and command-oriented workflows, especially for users with ultrawide screens where large click zones improve accuracy. Multiple commenters praised open-source options including warpd, wl-kbptr, and related projects, while others criticized closed-source tools for privacy and control reasons. OS support and maintenance concerns recur, with comparisons between Wayland, Xorg, and macOS behavior and warnings about stale projects. Some users remain skeptical of mouseless systems as niche or awkward, while others call them efficient for specific tasks or as an accessibility fallback. The thread also links the concept to automation, noting LLM-driven GUI control could use such methods for grounding actions, though humans may not find that workflow ideal. Another theme is ergonomics: several commenters prefer one-handed operation, but at least one voice rejects adopting new input habits. The discussion stays opinionated but practical, balancing enthusiasm for reduced hand movement against questions of usability, tool quality, and adoption friction.