Original title: Japan develops a method to recover up to 90% of lithium from used EV batteries and it could be a major breakthrough
Article
Japan says engineers at a recycling plant developed a process that replaces sodium hydroxide with recovered lithium hydroxide and can recover around 90% of lithium from used EV battery black mass. The process is reported to produce high-purity lithium and about 40% lower emissions than conventional methods. It is presented as a response to faster EV adoption, expensive mining, and Japan’s dependence on imported battery minerals. Officials also say throughput is expected to grow, with stronger production by 2027 and tens of thousands of tons by 2035, even as only about 14% of used lithium-ion batteries in Japan currently enter official recycling systems. In comments, participants note that lithium is already a high-purity, concentrated source and that 90% recovery may not by itself be novel. They also stress that commercial viability depends on recovery of other materials such as nickel, cobalt, graphite, copper, and aluminum as well as cost, energy demand, and emissions at full scale. The consensus in comments is that the claim’s importance hinges less on a single percentage and more on whether the full recycling chain is economically and environmentally scalable.
Most comments argue that high lithium recovery is not a new technical surprise because battery feedstock is relatively clean and modern processes already report similar or higher lithium recovery rates. Commenters separate recovery from economic recovery, emphasizing that low externalities, energy inputs, and contamination control are the real constraints. Several highlight that lithium is only one part of EV battery value and that multi-material recovery is needed for strong economics. A few criticize the quality of the writing and demand primary-source reporting, suggesting the framing may overstate novelty. Another frequent view is that industrialization cost, logistics, and grid-scale implementation matter far more than headline percentages. While one participant questions whether the article reflects official source material, others mostly converge on a pragmatic view: the process is promising only if it lowers total recycling cost and environmental burden at national and global scale.