Original title: The Diary
Article
The post introduces Riddle, an app for the reMarkable Paper Pro that lets users write questions or notes on a page and receive handwritten AI responses after page commit, creating a Tom Riddle-style notebook interaction without a screen UI. It guides setup through remagic and AppLoad, with one-command convenience, and also documents manual installation via zipped releases and SCP. The implementation captures raw pen events at high pressure resolution, converts strokes to a single-pixel skeleton, traces and animates writing, and can render through either a windowed Qt path or a direct takeover path that drives the e-ink engine for the lowest latency. The system sends each committed page as an inline PNG to a vision-compatible LLM endpoint and streams sentence-by-sentence output back onto the display. Configuration supports OpenAI-compatible providers, including OpenAI, OpenRouter, Groq, and local servers, with environment variables controlling key, base URL, model, reasoning behavior, and token limits. A local pi mode can keep a resident backend warm to reduce latency, and there is also a command-line oracle test flow for validation before launch. The project is MIT-licensed, but uses vendor binaries from one’s own device or SDK and only supports specific hardware/OS versions, and the author repeatedly highlights root-level risk, UI takeover behavior, and the need for maintained SSH recovery. Comments indicate strong interest in the tactile interface while also criticizing the lack of an embedded demo and noting concerns about novelty versus practical usability, which helps frame the release as an interesting prototype rather than a polished consumer product.
Commenters expressed a blend of enthusiasm, skepticism, and caution. Many praised the concept as a compelling, modern interface for interacting with LLMs through natural handwriting and gesture flow, and some compared it positively to faster, more immediate software experiences than traditional engineering bottlenecks. Others asked for stronger evidence, especially a short demo video or screenshots, saying the README’s framing can feel like clickbait without visual proof. Several readers noted that similar ideas already exist in browser or local-model experiments, raising questions about what differentiates this implementation beyond the hardware loop. A recurring concern is safety and social framing, with a few pointing out the Tom Riddle motif and possible harmful-use optics, while another calls for clearer polish and more lifelike ink emergence animation. Some users welcomed the persona-driven journaling metaphor and see broader applications across devices like Kindles, while others viewed it as a slower chat UI wrapped in novel packaging. The thread also contains strong disagreement over whether the technical implementation is sufficiently robust relative to the hype, but there is broad recognition of the project’s novelty and accessibility challenge.